a view on mens fashion

the wrong: using the same idea on the wrong context

product design, music, fashion, architecture, and movies.

which one of the above does not belong in the same group?
(hints: music is about emotions. movies are about experiences. product design is about function. architecture is about belonging. fashion is about cash.)

the answer is…. fashion. all others are about ideas.

but, it could be worst, when fashion has the wrong ideas – look at the givenchy menswear spring ‘08. please tell me what man would wear pink lace shorts and men’s tights? and what is his statement anyways? another example is thom browne spring ’09. he has similar ideas to put men in skirts. there were pants with a crotch dropped so low as to make them look like dresses? how many guys can dress like marc jacobs to work and to play?

when yves saint laruent pioneered the androgynous idea in 1966, he was reflecting his time and empowering women by giving them the option of wearing clothes with influence and power – menswear. that was a great idea. putting women’s clothes on a men’s body? that is a bad idea.

a female body is gracefully sculptural with attractive curve for child bearing; a male body is simply and totally utilitarian for hurting. womenswear designer spent over 100 years to perfect it for women. using those research and development for men is as appropriate as knocking off the aviation technology for submarines – ridiculous. so what should a fashionable man do?

think uniforms.

(first published in the jan. 2010 issue of his life magazine)

One thought on “a view on mens fashion

  1. Very nice post. I simply stumbled upon your blog and wished to mention that
    I have truly enjoyed surfing around your blog
    posts. After all I will be subscribing in your rss feed and
    I hope you write again soon!

Leave a Reply